Analysis of the Validity of the Instrument for Early Childhood Numeracy Literacy Assessment

Authors

  • Rivo Panji Yudha Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi
  • Teguh Samudra Hetharia Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v4i1.685

Keywords:

Numeracy Literacy, Early Childhood Assessment, Instrument Validity

Abstract

Numeracy literacy in early childhood is a fundamental aspect of cognitive development; however, valid assessment instruments remain limited in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the validity of numeracy literacy assessment instruments for early childhood in Cakranegara District, Mataram, Lombok. Employing a descriptive quantitative approach, the study involved 135 children with data collection methods through direct observation and numeracy tests. Instrument validation was conducted through content validity testing by three early childhood education experts and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis method. The research results indicate that the prototype instrument achieved an average validation score of 87.11%, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.725 and a significant Bartlett's test (χ2 = 968.515; p < 0.000). The inter-rater reliability test yielded an average value of 0.85, falling into the high category. This research produces valid, reliable, and contextual numeracy literacy assessment instruments that can be used to identify the numeracy development of early childhood children more accurately and effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprilia, N., Setiani, Y., & Hadi FS, C. A. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Numerasi Pada Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Yang Bernilai Budaya Lokal. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4824

Dong, Y., Clements, D. H., Day-Hess, C. A., Sarama, J., & Dumas, D. (2021). Measuring Early Childhood Mathematical Cognition: Validating and Equating Two Forms of the Research-Based Early Mathematics Assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211037195

Ebneter, D. S., & Latner, J. D. (2013). Stigmatizing attitudes differ across mental health disorders: A comparison of stigma across eating disorders, obesity, and major depressive disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e318288e23f

Faller, H., Kohlmann, T., Zwingmann, C., & Maurischat, C. (2006). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-940029

Fatmawati, D. S., & Aziz, H. (2022). Studi Analisis Pelaksanaan Asesmen terhadap Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini di KB X Pangandaran. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Guru Paud. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrpgp.v1i2.532

Hellstrand, H., Korhonen, J., Räsänen, P., Linnanmäki, K., & Aunio, P. (2020). Reliability and validity evidence of the early numeracy test for identifying children at risk for mathematical learning difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101580

Lindquist, M. M., & Gates, J. D. (2020). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.1.1.0053

Nur, I. R. D., Herman, T., & Dahlan, T. H. (2022). Numeracy Literacy in Early Childhood: An Investigation in Arithmetic, Geometry and Patterns in Early Stage. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika). https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7007

Oktafiani, N., Witono, A. H., & Ermiana, I. (2022). Kesiapan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Kegiatan Literasi dan Numerasi di SDN 1 Selebung. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.1049

Piaget, J. (2013). Origin of Intelligence in the Child. In Origin of Intelligence in the Child. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315006260

Purpura, D. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Early Numeracy Assessment: The Development of the Preschool Early Numeracy Scales. Early Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.991084

Raghubar, K. P., & Barnes, M. A. (2017). Early numeracy skills in preschool-aged children: a review of neurocognitive findings and implications for assessment and intervention. In Clinical Neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1259387

Rahmadeni, F. (2022). Urgensi Pengenalan Konsep Literasi Numerasi pada Anak Usia Dini. ARITHMETIC: Academic Journal of Math. https://doi.org/10.29240/ja.v4i1.4626

Rahman, M. H. (2019). TEKNIK ASSESMEN OBSERVASI DAN PERCAKAPAN SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMANTAUAN PERKEMBANGAN BAHASA ANAK DI TK PAMARDI SIWI NANGGULAN MAGUWOHARJO SLEMAN YOGYAKARTA. Tumbuh Kembang: Kajian Teori Dan Pembelajaran PAUD. https://doi.org/10.36706/jtk.v6i1.8351

Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. In Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001

Suyadi. (2016). Perencanaan dan Asesmen Perkembangan pada Anak Usia Dini (Studi Kasus pada Lembaga Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD/TK/RA)di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini.

Tazouti, Y., Thomas, A., Hoareau, L., Jarlégan, A., Hubert, B., & Luxembourger, C. (2024). Assessment of an educational classroom app’s impact on preschoolers’ early numeracy skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00698-1

Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis : A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care (JEPHC). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763982

Yudha, R. P. (2020). Validity And Reliability Rubric Of Performance Assessment Geometry Study In Junior High School Using The Many Facet Rasch Model Approach. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7100

Downloads

Published

2025-03-05

How to Cite

Yudha, R. P., & Hetharia, T. S. (2025). Analysis of the Validity of the Instrument for Early Childhood Numeracy Literacy Assessment. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 4(1), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v4i1.685