Analysis of Sidewalk Comfort Level Based on Width, Cleanliness, Surface Condition, Lighting, and Availability of Signage and Directional Indicators on Sudibyo Street Sidewalks in Tegal City

Authors

  • Dhiya Ulhaq Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan Tegal Indonesia
  • Muhammad Fahri Basfian Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan Tegal Indonesia
  • Nurina Vidya Ayuningtyas Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan Tegal Indonesia
  • Dani Fitria Brilianti Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan Tegal Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v3i4.549

Keywords:

Sidewalk, pedestarian, Comfort Level, urban walkability, street safety features

Abstract

Sidewalks are essential for facilitating pedestrian movement and promoting sustainable transportation in urban areas. On Kapten Sudibyo Street in Tegal City, which serves as a main access route to Kardinah Hospital, the sidewalks currently do not meet adequate safety and comfort standards. Problems such as uneven surfaces, reduced width, poor maintenance, and obstructions like illegal parking and public facilities hinder pedestrian comfort and accessibility. This study aims to assess the comfort level of these sidewalks, focusing on factors including width, cleanliness, surface condition, lighting, and signage. Using qualitative method with observations and Guttman-scale surveys distributed to 200 respondents, mainly local students who frequently use the sidewalks, the research analyzed how these factors impact perceived comfort. The results reveal a generally low comfort level, with 72% of respondents expressing dissatisfaction due to poor conditions of the sidewalk. Key recommendations include widening sidewalks to a minimum of 200 cm, repairing uneven surfaces, maintaining cleanliness, upgrading lighting, and providing clear signage. Additional measures involve relocating obstructive public facilities and enforcing regulations against illegal parking to enhance accessibility and safety. These improvements are crucial for creating a more inviting and functional pedestrian space, encouraging walking as a mode of transport, and contributing to a healthier urban environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agusman, E., et al. (2021). Pengaruh Tingkat Kenyamanan Trotoar terhadap Jumlah Pengguna. Jurnal Transportasi.

Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To Walk or Not to Walk? The Hierarchy of Walking Needs. Environment and Behavior.

Badland, H., & Schofield, G. (2005). The Built Environment and Transport-Related Physical Activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Frumkin, H., Frank, L., & Jackson, R. (2004). Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities. Island Press.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.

Huang, C., Sun, D., & Zhang, C. (2020). The Impact of Walkability on Urban Vibrancy. Journal of Urban Design.

Huang, Y., & Wong, T. (2020). The Role of Infrastructure in Enhancing Urban Walkability. Sustainability Review.

Jan, G., & Litman, T. (2020). Benefits of Pedestrian-Friendly Streets. Sustainability.

Krambeck, H. V., & Shah, J. (2006). The Global Walkability Index. World Bank.

Litman, T. (2020). Promoting Sustainable Transport. Journal of Urban Policy.

Litman, T. (2021). Evaluating Accessibility for Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Mason, J., et al. (2022). Understanding Public Space Use: Observational Techniques in Urban Studies. Journal of Urban Planning.

Rahmat, R. A. O. K., Ismail, A., & Napiah, M. (2019). Urban Sidewalk Design Standards: A Critical Review. Transportation Research.

Saraswaty, R. (2017). Evaluasi Infrastruktur Kota Ramah Pejalan Kaki. Jurnal Rekayasa Perkotaan.

Sisiopiku, V. P., & Akin, D. (2003). Pedestrian Behaviors at and Perceptions Toward Various Pedestrian Facilities. Transportation Research Record.

United Nations. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals Report.

Widodo, B. (2013). Urban Design Concepts. Gadjah Mada University Press.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Global Action Plan for Sustainable Mobility.

Zhang, L., et al. (2017). Evaluating Sidewalk Quality Using Multi-Criteria Analysis. Urban Development Studies.

Zhang, W., Zhao, Y., & Wang, Q. (2019). Sidewalk Accessibility and Inclusivity: A Study of Barriers for Disabled Pedestrians. Journal of Urban Mobility Studies.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Ulhaq, D., Basfian, M. F., Ayuningtyas, N. V., & Brilianti, D. F. (2024). Analysis of Sidewalk Comfort Level Based on Width, Cleanliness, Surface Condition, Lighting, and Availability of Signage and Directional Indicators on Sudibyo Street Sidewalks in Tegal City. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 3(4), 1611–1621. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v3i4.549