An Analysis on The Teacher’s Oral Feedback in Teaching English :  (A Descriptive Qualitative Research at SMK Negeri 6 Pontianak in Academic Year 2022/2023)

Nurul Puspitasari; Regina; Dwi Riyanti; Rahayu Apriliaswati; Eni Rosnija

doi:10.58526/jsret.v2i2.128

Authors

Nurul Puspitasari Universitas Tanjungpura
Regina Universitas Tanjungpura
Dwi Riyanti Universitas Tanjungpura
Rahayu Apriliaswati Universitas Tanjungpura
Eni Rosnija Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i2.128

Keywords:

Oral Feedback, Speaking Skills, Teaching English

Abstract

Feedback is one of the important components in the teaching and learning process. Feedback given by the teacher can make the teaching and learning process more effective. The teacher can optimize the learning process by giving feedback so students can understand the material better. Feedback can make students know their weaknesses and strengths so they can learn from there and evaluate themselves. This study focused on the types of oral feedback the teacher gave in teaching English at SMKN 6 Pontianak, especially in teaching students' speaking skills in class XI. This study aims to determine the types of oral feedback the teacher uses to teach speaking skills and find out the most frequently used oral feedback. The researcher conducted classroom observations and teacher interviews to collect data, which were then analyzed using the interactive model from Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). Based on classroom observations and teacher interviews, the researcher found that the teacher used positive and corrective oral feedback to teach students' speaking skills. Positive oral feedback was given in the form of reinforcement 22 times (46.81%) and evaluative nine times (19.15%), which totalled 31 times (65.96%). Other than that, corrective oral feedback was given in three different ways: recast 10 times (21.28%), elicitation three times (6.38%), and request for clarification three times (6.38%). Overall, the teacher gave oral corrective feedback 16 times (34.04%). From all types of oral feedback, it can be concluded that the most frequently used oral feedback by the English teacher at SMKN 6 Pontianak is positive oral feedback. While the most frequently used oral corrective feedback is recast.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bijami, M., Kashef, S. H., & Nejad , M. S. (2013). Peer feedback in learning English writing: Advantages. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(4), 91. doi:10.5296/jse.v3i4.4314

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Febrianingrum, L. (2020). Teacher's corrective feedback on students' oral responses. English Community Journal, 4(1), 12-23.

Gupta, P. (2017, October 27). Characteristics of effective learning feedback. Retrieved from EdTechReview: https://edtechreview.in/

Hadzic, S. (2016). Oral and written teacher feedback in an english as a foreign language classroom in Sweden. Degree Project Linnaeus University Sweden, 1-38.

Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Leavy, P. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York, United States of America: The Guilford Press.

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000365

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2022). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.

Masantiah, C., Pasiphol, S., & Tangdhanakanond, K. (2020). Student and feedback: which type of feedback is preferable? Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(2), 269–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.020

McCombes, S. (2019). Descriptive research design: Definition, methods and examples. Retrieved from Scribbr: https://www.scribbr.com

McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2014). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 1-6. doi:10.1177/0267659114559116

Melanie. (2020). Positive feedback examples to help you improve professionally. Retrieved from Matter: https://matterapp.com

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). California, United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc.

Nassaji , H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. doi:10.1177/1362168815572747

Petchprasert, A. (2012). Feedback in second language teaching and learning. US-China Foreign Language.

Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 265-302.

Sakiroglu, H. U. (2020). Oral corrective feedback preferences of university students in English communication classes. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 172-178.

Veliz , C. L. (2013). Corrective feedback in second language classrooms. 19, 283-292.

Wahyudi, D., & Sari, A. (2016). The use of media, variation, and feedback in the learning process to optimize student learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2), 94.

Wilbert, J., Grosche, M., & Gerdes, H. (2010). Effects of evaluative feedback on rate of learning and task motivation: An analogue experiment. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 8(2), 43-52.

Yulia, M., & Zainil, Y. (2021). An analysis of teachers’ oral feedback in EFL classroom interaction at SMP Negeri 10 Batam. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 45-52. doi:10.24036/jelt.v10i1.111373