Effectiveness of State Administrative Law: Perspectives Comparative from Indonesia and Singapore in Public service

Authors

  • Imam Syafa'i Master of Law Program, Islamic University of Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari
  • Indah Dewi Megasari Master of Law Program, Islamic University of Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v4i2.764

Keywords:

State Administrative Law, Public Service, Indonesia, Singapore

Abstract

Study This aiming for analyze and compare the effectiveness of State Administrative Law (HAN) in Indonesia and Singapore in context service public. Through approach comparative, research This make an effort identify similarities and differences in structure, system , implementation , and effectiveness of HAN in both countries. The methodology used is approach qualitative with studies case, collecting data through studies documents, analysis regulation legislation, as well as literature related . Research results show that although there is difference in approaches and priorities policy, both countries have the same goal, namely increase quality service public . In Indonesia, the challenges main lies in the implementation regulations and enforcement consistent law, while in Singapore, the focus more on efficiency and innovation technology in service public. Comparison This give outlook valuable about practice best and areas that need improved in each country. Research This conclude that HAN effectiveness is highly context dependent social , cultural and political a country, and commitment government towards bureaucratic reform and improvement service public

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abhinaya, D. and Jennifer, C. (2023). The role of law state administration for prevent corruption in indonesia . Gorontalo Law Review, 6(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i1.2683

Apriyanto , T. and Saraswati, R. (2023). Study of sanctions administrative to violation regulation immigration ( a review comparison law state administration ). Progressive Law Journal , 11(2), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.11.2.108-121

Fun , N. (2020). Supervision public to official the public who do action corruption : perspective law administration . Journal Outlook Juridika , 4(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v4i1.316

Fikri, F., Poesoko , H., Zainuri , Z., & Ali, M. (2024). Freies ermessen realizing good governance through the concept of the welfare state in perspective law public administration . SNAPP, 2(1), 397-403. https://doi.org/10.24929/snapp.v2i1.3162

Firmansyah, V. and Syam, F. (2022). Strengthening law preventive state administration practice corruption in self government Indonesia . Integrity Journal Anti-corruption , 7(2), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.32697/integrity.v7i2.817

Satria, R., Wagner, I., Utomo, S., Fitriani, R., & Astono , A. (2022). Problems state administrative decisions that are excluded from jurisdiction inspection Indonesian state administrative court . Current Journal Social and Humanities , 2(3), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v2i3.88

Seipul , S., Adepio , M., & Ardhan , M. (2024). The role of state administrative courts in to uphold principle interest general . Action Research Literate, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v8i5.343

Spaltani , B., Sulistiyono, A., & Sudarwanto , A. (2023). Institutionalization effort administration in frame repair bureaucracy and service public in indonesia . Journal of Contemporary Public Administration, 3(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.22225/jcpa.3.2.2023.83-90

(2022). Relevance principles general governance in system administration country.. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6vwm3

Abhinaya, D. and Jennifer, C. (2023). The role of law state administration for prevent corruption in indonesia . Gorontalo Law Review, 6(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i1.2683

Fun , N. (2020). Supervision public to official the public who do action corruption : perspective law administration . Journal Outlook Juridika , 4(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v4i1.316

Firmansyah, V. and Syam, F. (2022). Strengthening law preventive state administration practice corruption in self government Indonesia . Integrity Journal Anti-corruption , 7(2), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.32697/integrity.v7i2.817

Reyhan, M. and Triadi , I. (2024). Constitutional law and its relationship with knowledge others . ijlj , 1(4), 8. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2589

Wicaksana , D., Sartono , S., & BB, S. (2023). Service public in the district kolaka East : review qualitative in the population and civil registry office regency kolaka East . Pamarenda Public Administration and Government Journal, 3(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.52423/pamarenda.v3i2.45373

Baum, S. and Mahizhnan, A. (2015). Government-with-you., 711-725. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch033

Chan, C. and Pan, S. (2013). Singapore e-government initiatives: engaging users., 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417839_0002

Everest-Philipps, M. (2016). Meritocracy and public service excellence. Review of Civil Service , (1). https://doi.org/10.56289/ijcsrp.9

Ha, H. (2013). E-government in singapore ., 176-197. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4173-0.ch009

Quah, J. (2013). Ensuring good governance in Singapore . International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(5), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-05-2013-0069

(2023). Towards efficiency and transparency : bureaucratic reform and rationalization as step transformation .. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/29wh6

Firmansyah, V. and Syam, F. (2022). Strengthening law preventive state administration practice corruption in self government Indonesia . Integrity Journal Anti-corruption , 7(2), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.32697/integrity.v7i2.817

Prasetya , A. (2019). Integrating bureaucratic reform with innovation sector public . Policy Analysis Journal , 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37145/jak.v1i1.23

Rahim, A., Safitri , N., Nurjanah , N., Anabah, S., & Nurhikmah, W. (2023). Implementation law state administration in prevent practice corruption in indonesia . Jiip - Journal Scientific Educational Sciences , 6(8), 5790-5794. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i8.2572

Riza, D. and Kurnia, M. (2024). Arrangement submission lawsuit that goes through effort administrative in the form of an appeal according to Constitution state administrative courts and laws administration governance . Unes Journal of Swara Justisia , 7(4), 1258-1267. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.439

Sumantri , I. (2022). Reorientation of bureaucratic reform and good governance in organization sector public in Indonesia . Sculpture Journal Knowledge Public Administration Government and Politics , 5(2), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.54783/japp.v5i2.679

Wahyudi, R. (2020). Maladministration bureaucracy in indonesia in perspective history . Niara Journal , 13(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.31849/niara.v13i1.3295

Wibowo, A. and Kertati , I. (2022). Bureaucratic reform and service public . Public Service and Governance Journal, 3(01), 01. https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v3i01.2785

Wicaksono , K. (2019). Transforming the spirit of new public service into public management reform in Indonesia . Journal Management Public Services , 2(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.20190

Wijaya, W. (2020). Authority Discretion about opportunity attitude act state administration in empowerment law progressive . Legal Issues , 49(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.148-159

Wulandari, S. (2024). Strengthening bureaucratic reform in Indonesia towards the era of society 5.0. jpr , 4(2), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.31294/jpr.v4i2.3182

Yusriadi , Y. (2023). Bureaucratic reform in strengthening governance government in Indonesia .. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/j9nz3

yahya , s. (2023). Development history bureaucracy government Indonesia .. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vycja

Downloads

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

Syafa’i, I., & Megasari, I. D. (2025). Effectiveness of State Administrative Law: Perspectives Comparative from Indonesia and Singapore in Public service. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 4(2), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v4i2.764