Corrective Feedback Towards Student’s English Writing of  Hospital Administration Students at STIKES Baptist Hospital Kediri

yoyok febrijanto

doi:10.58526/jsret.v2i3.189

Authors

yoyok febrijanto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i3.189

Abstract

Administration students at STIKES Baptist Hospital Kediri using descriptive qualitative approach. The subjects was 9 students of second semester. Collecting data about corrective feedback used questionnaire and interview about students’ response in terms of attitude. Analysis data based on three concurrent flows of activities: data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The result showed that the teacher gave direct corrective feedback in students’ English writing by circling the students’ errors and providing the correct answer in grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, preposition, article and content. The data from questionnaire for students’ attitude showed most of students agreed that the teacher should point out grammar errors. The students have positive responses by remembering their grammar mistakes and feel more motivated to go on learning when the teacher corrects their error in writing. They answered that they will revise their writing if their errors are corrected by the teacher. It can be concluded that most of the students have positive attitude to teacher’s corrective feedback.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allman, B., Sara F., Jeffrey O., Sally P., &Vicky S. 2000. Skills for Successful Teaching: McGraw-Hill Children’s Publishing.

Alwasilah, C. 2004. Perspektif Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Indonesia dalam Konteks Persaingan Global. Bandung :Andira

Amrhein&Nassaji. 2010. Written corrective feedback: What do students and

teachers prefer and why. Journal of CJAL * RCLA, 95.

Anggraeni , W. 2012. The Characteristics of Teacher’s Feedback in The Speaking Activities of the Grade Nine Students of SMP N 2 Depok (Master’s Thesis, Yogyakarta State University: English Education Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts). Retrieved fromhttp://eprints.uny.ac.id/25678/1/Wahyu%20Anggraeni%2006202241034.pdf

Brown, H. M. 1978. How to Write: A Practical Rhetoric. Wichita Falls:

Midwestern State University.

Brown, D. 2000. Teaching by Principles an Interactive. San Fransisco: Longman

Brown, D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc

Cameron, L. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners.Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Campillo,P. S. 2015. EFL Students’ Attitudes and Preferences towards Written Corrective Feedback. Departament d’Estudis Anglesos: Universitat Jaume I

Cohen, A. D., &Cavalcanti, M. 1990. Feedback on written compositions: Teacher

and student verbal reports. InSecond language writing: Research insights

for the classroom. Ed. B. Kroll, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

-177.

Cohen, R.F. & Miller, J.L. 2001.Reason to Write: Strategies for Success inAcademic Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Diab, R. L. 2006. Error correction and feedback in the EFL writing classroom: Comparing instructor and student preferences. English Teaching Forum, 44(3), 2-13

Dornyei, Z. 2001. Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition.Great Britain: (no city) St Edmundsbury Press. Ltd

Ellis, R. 2009. Analysing Learner Language. New York: Oxford

Enginarlar, H. 1993. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System 21,193-204.

Ferris, D. R. 1995. Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29, 33-53.

Ferris, D. R. 1997. The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOLQuarterly 31, 3 1 S-339.

Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., &Tinki, S. 1997. Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 6, 1X-182.

Ghandi, M.&Maghsoudi, M. 2014. The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Spelling Errors. Journal of English Language Teaching.Vol. 7: 53-61

Hashemnezhad, H &Mohammadnejad, S. 2012. A Case for Direct and Indirect Feedback: The Other Side of Coin. Journal of English Language Teaching. Vol.5: 230-239

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. 2006. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101