Strengthening Cocoa Farmers’ Capacity for EUDR Compliance: A Policy Review of Agricultural Education and Extension in Indonesia

Authors

  • Muhammad Obie Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Halu Oleo University, Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v5i2.1161

Keywords:

Agricultural Education, Agricultural Extension, Cocoa Farmers, EUDR Compliance, Capacity Building, Indonesia

Abstract

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) presents significant challenges for cocoa-producing countries by requiring compliance with strict standards related to traceability, geolocation, and deforestation-free production. As a major cocoa producer, Indonesia must strengthen the capacity of smallholder farmers to meet these emerging sustainability requirements. This study aims to review the role of agricultural education and extension policies in supporting cocoa farmers’ readiness for EUDR compliance. A policy review approach was employed using secondary data obtained from academic publications, government regulations, policy documents, and reports from international organizations related to agricultural education, extension services, sustainability governance, and cocoa development. Data were analyzed through thematic content analysis to identify policy priorities, implementation challenges, and capacity-building opportunities. The findings indicate that agricultural education and extension systems play a crucial role in enhancing farmers’ knowledge, environmental awareness, digital literacy, and traceability capabilities. However, existing policies remain constrained by limited institutional coordination, unequal access to extension services, and insufficient integration of EUDR-related competencies into farmer training programs. Strengthening policy coherence, expanding sustainability-oriented extension initiatives, and promoting digital learning mechanisms are essential for improving farmers’ preparedness. This study contributes to the literature on agricultural education and provides policy recommendations for supporting sustainable cocoa production and EUDR compliance in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auld, G., Renckens, S., & Cashore, B. (2024). Sustainability governance and emerging trade regulations in global commodity chains. Global Environmental Politics, 24(1), 45–63.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. *Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.

Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., Dripps, W., Habron, G., Harré, N., Jarchow, M., Losch, K., Michel, J., Mochizuki, Y., Rieckmann, M., Parnell, R., Walker, P., & Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—Toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16(1), 13–29.

Davis, K., & Sulaiman, R. (2022). Extension and advisory services for sustainable agricultural development. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28(4), 389–406.

European Commission. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on deforestation-free products. European Commission.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas: Status Report. FAO.

Garrett, R. D., Carlson, K. M., Rueda, X., & Noojipady, P. (2023). Supply chain sustainability, traceability, and zero-deforestation commitments in global agricultural commodities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48, 421–447.

International Cocoa Organization. (2024). Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics. ICCO.

Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.

Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2024). Digital agricultural innovation and sustainability transitions: Emerging opportunities and challenges. Agricultural Systems, 217, 103902.

Knook, J., Eory, V., Brander, M., & Moran, D. (2023). Agricultural advisory services and sustainability transitions among smallholder farmers. Agricultural Systems, 212, 103765.

Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K. M., Fleck, L. C., Garrett, R. D., le Polain de Waroux, Y., McDermott, C. L., McLaughlin, D., Newton, P., Nolte, C., Pacheco, P., Rausch, L. L., Streck, C., Thorlakson, T., & Walker, N. F. (2023). The role of supply-chain initiatives in sustainability transitions. Nature Sustainability, 6(8), 925–934.

Neilson, J. (2022). Sustainability governance in Indonesia’s cocoa sector: Challenges and opportunities for smallholders. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 63(2), 215–229.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Trendov, N. M., Varas, S., & Zeng, M. (2021). Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas: Status Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Sustainable Commodity Supply Chains and Rural Development. UNDP.

World Bank. (2023). Agriculture and Food Global Practice: Supporting Sustainable Agricultural Development. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Obie, M. (2026). Strengthening Cocoa Farmers’ Capacity for EUDR Compliance: A Policy Review of Agricultural Education and Extension in Indonesia . Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 5(2), 1778–1789. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v5i2.1161