Cooperative learning “three-steps-interview” to enhance students’ speaking skill from the perspective of students’ creativity

Authors

  • Putri Novitasari Novitasari Universitas Wahidiyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i1.93

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out whether: (1) cooperative learning three-steps-interview is more effective than direct method for the 11th grade  students; (2) students having low creativity have better speaking skill than those having low creativity; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching methods and students’ creativity in teaching speaking skill for the 11th grade of SMAN 8 Kediri. This research was an experimental research conducted in SMA N 8 Kediri. The population was all the 11th grade of SMA N 8 Kediri. The researcher took the sample of the research by using cluster random sampling and devided the group into two. One became the experimental group taught using cooperative learning three-steps-interview and one another became the control group taught using direct method. The number of sample was arround of 60 students. The technique of the data collection was done by giving oral test for speaking skill and written test for verbal creativity test. After collecting the data of the research sample, further the data was analyzed using ANOVA 2x2 and Tukey formula to test the research hypothesis. The result of this research shows that: (1) cooperative learning three-steps-interview (TSI) is more effective than direct method (DM) to teach speaking skill for the 11th grade of SMA N 8 Kediri; (2) students having high creativity have better speaking skill than those having low creativity; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching methods and students’ creativity to teach speaking skill for the 11th grade of SMA N 8 Kediri. At last, it is recomended that: (1) teacher should apply cooperative learning three-steps-interview (TSI) to teach speaking skill; (2) the students should apply three-steps-interview to explore their speaking skill; and (3) other researchers should make such an improvement by trying to use this research topic with different subject of the research and different psychological point of view besides creativity which may have correlation with students’ speaking skill.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, Zaheer and Mahmood, Nazir. 2010. “Effects of Cooperative Learning vs. Traditional

Instruction on Prospective Teachers’ Learning Experience and Achievement.” Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, year: 2010, vol: 43, no: 1, 151-164.

Al-Oweidi, Alia. 2013. “Creative Characteristics and Its Relation to Achievement and School Type among Jordanian Students.” Creative Education 2013. Vol.4, No.1, 29-34.

Al-Tamimi, Nasser Omer M. And Attamimi, Rais Ahmed. 2014. “Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning in Enhancing Speaking Skills and Attitudes towards Learning English.“ International Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 6, No. 4, page 27-45. Retrieved on 15th of May, 2015.

Andi Mallombasi. “The Application of Three-steps-interview to Increase the Students’ Speaking Skill.” Exposure Journal. Vol.1, No. 2, Mei 2012.English Education Department Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Makasar.

Ary, Donald, et.al. 2010. Introduction to Research In education 8th Edition. U.S.A: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2003. Language Assesment Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Longman.

Chanda, N. K.. 1989. Perspective in Psycho-Educational Research. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.

Castillo, Claudia Yanive Prieto. 2007. “Improving Eleventh Graders’ Oral Production in English Class through Cooperative Learning Strategies - Mejora de la producción oral de estudiantes de grado undécimo en clase de inglés, a través de estrategias de aprendizaje cooperativo.” Profile 8, 2007,Page 75-90.

Craft, Anna. 2001. “An analysis of research and literature on CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION. Report prepared for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.”

Gomez, Jose G. 2007. “What do we knowabout creativity. “The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 7, No. 1, 31-43.

Hak, Tony, et.al. 2008. “The Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI): An observation-based method for pretesting self-completion questionnaires.” European Survey Research Association: Survey Research Methods (2008), Vol.2 , No.3 , page 143-150.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching Third Edition. Cambridge: Longman

Holt, Daniel. D. 1993. Cooperative Learning A Response to Linguistics and Cultural Diversity. United States of America: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta System, Inc.

Irene Brainnita O. 2015. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning to Teach Writing Viewed from Students’ Creativity. thesis. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Kotelnikov, Vadim. 2012. Personal Success Creativity Blog.

Lersen, Diane-Freeman. 1985. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mart, Cagri Tugrul. 2013. “The Direct Method: A Good Start to Teach Oral Language.” International Journal of academic Research in Business and Social science. Vol. 3, No. 11.

Orlich, Donald C, et.al. 1998. Teaching strategies: A Guiede to Better Instruction. Boston: Hughton Mifflin Company.

Piirto, Jane. 2011. Creativity for 21st Century Skills-How to Embed Creativity into the Curicullum. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

Rani Candrakirana P. 2014. Improving Students’ Speaking Skill Through Three-steps-interview Technique. thesis. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Rockler, Michael J. 1988. Innovative Teaching Strategies. United States America: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Publisher.

Taylor, Marjorie. 2013. Oxford Library of Psychology: The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination. New York: Oxford Univerity Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Novitasari, P. N. (2023). Cooperative learning “three-steps-interview” to enhance students’ speaking skill from the perspective of students’ creativity. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 2(1), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i1.93